[ADEA logo] [Table]Members only sectionSite en françaisList of site contentsBack to front page


[ADEA Newsletter Image]

About ADEA
Working Groups
Programs and Activities
Publications
Newsletter
Latest Issue
Newsletter Archive
Newsletter Index
Databases
Calendar of Events

African Education Systems: A Comparative Economic Analysis 1

by Alain Mingat and Bruno Suchaut - De Boeck Université Edition 2000


Alain Mingat and Bruno Suchaut's work is a seminal analysis of education systems in sub-Saharan Africa. The authors examine 29 African countries with populations of over 2 million and per capita GDP less than US$2,000, comparing their education systems to those of non-African countries that have similar levels of GDP.2

What makes this study original is its three-fold perspective on the subject matter. First, it adopts an analytical perspective based on rigorously compiled factual data. Second, it takes an economic approach, studying "the relationship between the goals of the school system, which are numerous, and the means, which are scarce." This is particularly relevant to African countries, since the stronger the constraints on the resources potentially available to the school system, the more difficult-and the more urgent- it is to identify the compromises that must be made and the priorities to be set. The third noteworthy feature of this work lies in its comparative perspective, which not only allows cross-country comparisons but also helps to identify possible relationships between the diverse modes of school organization in different national contexts and the results obtained in terms of quantity, quality, efficiency, and equity.

The book comprises seven chapters, which address the following topics:

  • The quantitative development of school systems and the resources mobilized;
  • The unit costs of schooling;
  • The factors of school system organization and school quality;
  • School careers and the issues of access, retention, repetition and transition between cycles;
  • Effectiveness of schooling and the relations between the educational and productive spheres;
  • Equity in education systems;
  • Administrative and pedagogical management of school systems.

The study's main findings concerning the coverage of education systems, the quality of schools, and the efficiency of school systems are summarized below.

School system coverage

Where the quantity of education and the coverage of school systems are concerned, the study finds that:

    .The French-speaking countries of West Africa, particularly the Sahel countries, are lagging behind in school enrolments.
    .The amount of public funding allocated to education in Africa is roughly the same as in Asian and Latin American countries.
    .There is little connection between the overall volume of resources made available to an education system and the coverage of this system. The efficiency with which resources are used matters more than the amount actually appropriated. In 1993, the French-speaking countries provided 1.3 years, on average, of schooling for each percentage point of GDP allocated to the education sector; the English-speaking African countries provided 2.1 years, on average; and the less developed countries in Asia and the Americas, 3.1 years.
    .In the French-speaking countries (particularly the Sahel countries), the unit costs of education are high at all education levels. (See Chart on p.19) Compared to the Asian and Latin American countries, unit costs at the primary level are on average, 25% higher, in the English-speaking African countries, 75% higher in the French-speaking countries and 138% higher in the Sahel countries.
    .The high unit costs in the French-speaking countries are mainly due to the level of teachers' wages, which are high both in relative terms (as a ratio of the country's per capita GDP) and in comparative terms (with other countries). High wage scales for teachers are by far the most important reason for the low schooling rates in these countries.

Quality

Where school quality is concerned, the study highlights the following:

    .The performance of pupils is strongly tied to the country's level of socio-economic development.
    .In contrast, there is little connection between the level of unit costs and pupils' average level of learning.
    .Educational quality does not require hiring teachers who have a level of general education much higher than the first secondary cycle certificate. Since their level of educational attainment determines teachers' salaries, this finding obviously has important implications for school unit costs.
    .In-service training develops teaching skills more effectively than does initial training.
    .The nature of school buildings has no significant impact on the quality of schools.
    .School feeding programs have a positive effect on learning.

Efficiency and equity

The study reveals that the French-speaking countries, particularly in the Sahel, generally make inefficient use of public appropriations for the school sector. It notes that:

    .Repetition rates are high (over 20%, on average) in French-speaking Africa. This implies that 40% of public funding for education is "wasted" in the French-speaking countries (as against 25% in the English-speaking countries).
    .For reasons of economic and social efficiency as well as equity, countries at a level of development comparable to that of the sub-Saharan African countries should give priority to investment in primary education, aiming for the broadest possible coverage and passable quality.
    .The countries with the highest unit costs also have the narrowest educational coverage and the most inequitable distribution of the public funds allocated to education; this is particularly true in the French-speaking Sahel countries. Similarly, the bias against girls is significantly greater in the French-speaking African countries (and, once again, in the Sahel countries) than in the English-speaking countries.

School system management

Since the greatest differences among schools have more to do with the way resources are shared out and used than with the actual amount of resources pro-vided, the administrative and pedagogical management of school systems is important. The authors recommend that the role of school inspectorates be modified. It also suggests that school inspectors be trained to keep management charts of the schools in their districts in order to improve the management of resources and results.

The book concludes with recommendations for new perspectives in educational policy. Although this cross-country comparative approach has its limits (limited availability and quality of data, national averages that do not reflect sharp differences within a given country, etc.), a study of this kind is nonetheless highly original and useful. It brings a great deal of data and innovative analyses to bear on the educational policy decisions that are needed, while also examining the impact of budgetary constraints and the maneuvering room available to policy makers.




1. Exists in French only. Title in French: Les systèmes éducatifs africains - Une analyse économique comparative.
2. The main data cover 57 countries with over 2 million inhabitants (29 countries in sub-Saharan Africa and 28 non-African countries for which the Gross National Product (GNP) per person was less than US$2000 in 1993.




Previous Article: New Books on HIV/AIDS | Contents Page | Next Article: A New President for ADEA






About ADEA | Working Groups | Programs | Publications | Newsletter | Databases | Calendar | Site Map | En français

Association for the Development of Education in Africa
7-9 rue Eugène-Delacroix
75116 Paris, France
Tel: + 33/ (0) 145.03.77.57
Fax: + 33/ (0) 145.03.39.65
adea@iiep.unesco.org

Last modified: June 26, 2001